Action / delivery scenario
- Signs online casino compact.
- Uses revenue to deliver each respondent's top priority.
- Measures upside and risk of policy action plus delivery.
VANTAGE DATA HOUSE
Testing the political effect of signing an online gaming compact and delivering voter priorities versus inaction
Response Universe
| Party | Signing + delivery | No signing / no delivery | Signing advantage |
|---|
Action / delivery effect - Inaction / no-delivery effect. Positive values mean action-delivery performs better than inaction for the selected response.Adjust the turnout-rate assumption. The default uses the current poststratified expected-turnout topline, while Key Findings and summary vote equivalents continue to use modeled poststratified denominators. Net Landry position is treated as a vote-margin equivalent.
Archetypes grouped by partisan lean, sorted by vote-equivalent contribution. Shows signing effect, action-vs.-inaction advantage, and estimated vote equivalent.
Bar length and row order reflect estimated vote-equivalent contribution — how much each group's movement translates into votes in Landry's margin. Hover any row for percentage-point change, action/inaction breakdown, and denominator details.
Have questions about this experiment-effects report or ideas for future analysis? We'd love to hear from you.
Get in Touch